prompt1 : extract information from  breast pathology report. List the histological classification, i.e. type of cancer or DCIS, subtype, description of any necrosis, any mention of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes,  histological grade, nuclear grade,  lymphovascular invasion, calcification, receptor status, IHC and any other ancillary testing results.  List out and expand the main points.
prompt2 : The report is - Subtype LumA, Surgical Pathology: Final. CLINICAL HISTORY: Inflammatory breast ca. Breast cancer. GROSS EXAMINATION: A. "Left breast biopsy, received fresh. A fragment of skin which is 3.3 cm. long and 0.4 cm in diameter attached to underlying fibroadipose tissue which. is 2.7 cm thick x 3.5 x 1 cm in greatest dimensions. The specimen has been. previously partially sectioned revealing a poorly defined area of pink tissue. measuring approximately 2.5 x 1.5 x 1 cm in greatest dimensions. This does. not represent the true sides of the lesion. Portions of the tissue have. submitted for ER/PR evaluation. It is noted that this is a representative. fragment of larger lesion and margins are not require for the specimen. Representative sections are submitted in Blocks A1 and A2. DIAGNOSIS: A. BREAST, LEFT, INCISIONAL BIOPSY: POORLY DIFFERENTIATED CARCINOMA WITH EXTENSIVE VASCULAR INVASION. IN SITU CARCINOMA IS NOT PRESENT. NOTE: THE TUMOR HAS FEATURES OF LOBULAR CARCINOMA, BUT AN IN SITU COMPONENT. IS NOT PRESENT. eBrowser Result for: 1 of 1.

expanded version (tokens=629) : 
 Here is the information extracted from the breast pathology report:

- Histological classification: Poorly differentiated carcinoma with extensive vascular invasion.
- Subtype: LumA (based on receptor status)
- Necrosis: No mention of necrosis in the report.
- Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes: No mention of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the report.
- Histological grade: Not mentioned in the report.
- Nuclear grade: Not mentioned in the report.
- Lymphovascular invasion: Extensive vascular invasion mentioned in the report.
- Calcification: No mention of calcification in the report.
- Receptor status: ER and PR evaluation performed on the submitted tissue, further detailed results not mentioned in the report.
- IHC and ancillary testing results: No mention of any additional testing or IHC results in the report.

Overall, the report describes a poorly differentiated carcinoma with extensive vascular invasion. The subtype is LumA based on receptor status, and no necrosis or tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were mentioned in the report. The report does not provide any information on the histological grade, nuclear grade, calcification presence, or any additional testing results beyond ER/PR evaluation.

prompt : Please generate a succinct report in 75 words from the above information. Exclude any filler words or sentences. If something is not mentioned or specified, exclude it from the report. Low verbosity.

final output (tokens=743) : 
 Left breast biopsy revealed a poorly differentiated LumA subtype carcinoma with extensive vascular invasion. In situ carcinoma, necrosis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, histological grade, and nuclear grade were not present/mentioned. ER/PR evaluation was performed on submitted tissue for receptor status assessment. No calcifications or additional testing were reported.

